Welcome to our new web site!
To give our readers a chance to experience all that our new website has to offer, we have made all content freely avaiable, through October 1, 2018.
During this time, print and digital subscribers will not need to log in to view our stories or e-editions.
Under protest, I will pay the “fine on Count I of $20 and court costs of $135.50” for a speeding ticket I received on County Road 700E. Having never received a speeding ticket in my 46 years as a driver, I trusted our legal system to exonerate me. In my lifetime, I never expected to read, “State of Indiana Montgomery County vs. Susan Mitchel” on any legal documents. Nor did I expect to feel intimidated by papers handed to me by a police officer, “If you demand a trial and are found to have committed the violation, your license may be suspended for up to 1 year, you may be assessed costs, and you may be fined: Class C Infraction: Max $500.” Perhaps this explains why less than three percent of drivers demand court trials for speeding infractions. Being innocent, I entered Montgomery Superior Court 2 with confidence on Thursday, Dec. 19.
I quickly discovered the chances of winning in Indiana’s courtrooms are almost non-existent, and defendants spend much more than the costs of their initial tickets while “denying the violation/s.” While our laws proclaim the burden of proof resides with the state, the reality is that our court system is “stacked” against Hoosiers. I exited that courtroom disheartened, disillusioned and dumbfounded. I will not be seeking additional legal counsel, nor will I be appealing the verdict to the Indiana Court of Appeals as suggested by the judge. The costs to do so are ridiculous — $250 plus exorbitant attorney’s fees. Yes, the judge admonished me to have an attorney if appealing her verdict. This decision “knocked the wind from my sails.” I am pondering how many others have been convicted for traffic infractions they did not commit. I remain innocent of these charges. This verdict does not change the truth.